<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banished from Consideration or diScussion</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265</link>
	<description>My personal/Catholic blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Crawford</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=265#comment-320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad you were able to see the humor in it Danny.  I was a bit worried you&#039;d see it as a mean-spirited action on my part when (as you rightly determined) it was all in good fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you were able to see the humor in it Danny.  I was a bit worried you&#8217;d see it as a mean-spirited action on my part when (as you rightly determined) it was all in good fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Capps</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Capps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=265#comment-319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol with the bans. What is said is that my post makes more sense now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol with the bans. What is said is that my post makes more sense now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=265#comment-318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cal Banned&#039;s Great!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal Banned&#8217;s Great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Capps</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Capps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 03:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=265#comment-317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(editors note: removed BCS commentary... sorryÂ Danny, but the Rose Bowl requires no impressive wins for Cal, just victories)Â 

I think you are taking the wrong stance! TheÂ BANNED is a necessary evil. I would enjoy very much your ranting about not having an impressive win to try and get more votes! They need to have impressive wins. They might not have a great shot at the national title, but they have a very good chance at the Rose bowl. Also if some things fall through they could make it to the championship game.

If BANNED orÂ BANNED lose to someone before they meet each other. Then the loser beats the undefeated one. Alredy BANNED is ahead of those teams.

BANNED and BANNED both play BANNED.Â BANNED will be ahead of BANNED.

BANNEDÂ andÂ BANNED are tough games for theÂ BANNED of the above game also. If they drop a game,Â BANNED leap frogs both of them!

IfÂ BANNED beats BANNED, not only do they get more BANNED, they also pass BANNED!

BANNED/ BANNED. Root forÂ BANNED in this game, and BANNED will fall past BANNED.

All these are not that hard to imagine! BANNED actually could fight for BANNED!

Also how come this comments page is Oregon colors? jk]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(editors note: removed BCS commentary&#8230; sorryÂ Danny, but the Rose Bowl requires no impressive wins for Cal, just victories)Â </p>
<p>I think you are taking the wrong stance! TheÂ BANNED is a necessary evil. I would enjoy very much your ranting about not having an impressive win to try and get more votes! They need to have impressive wins. They might not have a great shot at the national title, but they have a very good chance at the Rose bowl. Also if some things fall through they could make it to the championship game.</p>
<p>If BANNED orÂ BANNED lose to someone before they meet each other. Then the loser beats the undefeated one. Alredy BANNED is ahead of those teams.</p>
<p>BANNED and BANNED both play BANNED.Â BANNED will be ahead of BANNED.</p>
<p>BANNEDÂ andÂ BANNED are tough games for theÂ BANNED of the above game also. If they drop a game,Â BANNED leap frogs both of them!</p>
<p>IfÂ BANNED beats BANNED, not only do they get more BANNED, they also pass BANNED!</p>
<p>BANNED/ BANNED. Root forÂ BANNED in this game, and BANNED will fall past BANNED.</p>
<p>All these are not that hard to imagine! BANNED actually could fight for BANNED!</p>
<p>Also how come this comments page is Oregon colors? jk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=265#comment-316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I bitter just a little bit about Mack Brown? Yes. Yes I am.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I bitter just a little bit about Mack Brown? Yes. Yes I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Crawford</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=265#comment-315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Until Mack Brown breaks out his speed-dial&quot;... that cracks me up.

I&#039;m even willing to discuss Pac-10 wins and losses.  Things like can Cal lose to USC and still win the Pac-10 (answer: yes, if Oregon beats them and wins out).  But I just don&#039;t want to discuss anything that isn&#039;t about wins, loses and Pac-10 championship tie-breakers.

I just don&#039;t want to talk about &quot;quality wins&quot; and crud like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Until Mack Brown breaks out his speed-dial&#8221;&#8230; that cracks me up.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m even willing to discuss Pac-10 wins and losses.  Things like can Cal lose to USC and still win the Pac-10 (answer: yes, if Oregon beats them and wins out).  But I just don&#8217;t want to discuss anything that isn&#8217;t about wins, loses and Pac-10 championship tie-breakers.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t want to talk about &#8220;quality wins&#8221; and crud like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=265#comment-314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good call. BCS at this point is useless...although it is fun to watch and listen to those SEC people whine and complain about how tough they have it. 

Cal controls its own destiny, simple as that. Win out and let the chips fall as they may. Worst case scenaio would be the Rose Bowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call. BCS at this point is useless&#8230;although it is fun to watch and listen to those SEC people whine and complain about how tough they have it. </p>
<p>Cal controls its own destiny, simple as that. Win out and let the chips fall as they may. Worst case scenaio would be the Rose Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=265#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=265#comment-313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see where you&#039;re coming from, Ken. The reality for Cal fans is: If Cal wins out, it goes to the Rose Bowl (or in a bizarre chain of events, the national title game). That&#039;s pretty basic, and I think the chances for a Pac-10 title are the best Cal has had in years. So it&#039;s a good thing to focus on, and it&#039;s something that Cal can control itself.

If Cal loses to USC, there might still be a Rose Bowl in there, but it would require a chain of events almost as bizarre as the one leading to the title game, and would be completely out of Cal&#039;s hands. It&#039;s just not something we can worry about. Until Mack Brown breaks out his speed-dial, it&#039;s best if we all just not think about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see where you&#8217;re coming from, Ken. The reality for Cal fans is: If Cal wins out, it goes to the Rose Bowl (or in a bizarre chain of events, the national title game). That&#8217;s pretty basic, and I think the chances for a Pac-10 title are the best Cal has had in years. So it&#8217;s a good thing to focus on, and it&#8217;s something that Cal can control itself.</p>
<p>If Cal loses to USC, there might still be a Rose Bowl in there, but it would require a chain of events almost as bizarre as the one leading to the title game, and would be completely out of Cal&#8217;s hands. It&#8217;s just not something we can worry about. Until Mack Brown breaks out his speed-dial, it&#8217;s best if we all just not think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
