<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking back on 2006: Tennessee game</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=404</link>
	<description>My personal/Catholic blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Crawford</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=404#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=404#comment-482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see just what the offense looks like next year.  To be honest, I think Tedford&#039;s tendencies to both be very kind to other football professionals like Dunbar and how he loves to hold his cards close to his chest makes it very hard to read what of the Tedford-Dunbar offense will still be in place next year.  I also think the spring game/practices are a bit deceptive as well since it is more about evaluating talent and less about specific play calls.

In addition, I think that even if Tedford keeps some of the Dunbar aspects, I expect that over time it&#039;ll get phased out just by the nature of the type of football he&#039;s comfortable with, even if it&#039;s not his intention to do so.  While that may not be an important statement for the Tennessee game, I think by the time our old &quot;friends&quot; USC roll into town, we&#039;ll be seeing the offense that won us the game in 2003.

But all of this is just my guessing at something that only Tedford knows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see just what the offense looks like next year.  To be honest, I think Tedford&#8217;s tendencies to both be very kind to other football professionals like Dunbar and how he loves to hold his cards close to his chest makes it very hard to read what of the Tedford-Dunbar offense will still be in place next year.  I also think the spring game/practices are a bit deceptive as well since it is more about evaluating talent and less about specific play calls.</p>
<p>In addition, I think that even if Tedford keeps some of the Dunbar aspects, I expect that over time it&#8217;ll get phased out just by the nature of the type of football he&#8217;s comfortable with, even if it&#8217;s not his intention to do so.  While that may not be an important statement for the Tennessee game, I think by the time our old &#8220;friends&#8221; USC roll into town, we&#8217;ll be seeing the offense that won us the game in 2003.</p>
<p>But all of this is just my guessing at something that only Tedford knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HydroTech</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=404#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HydroTech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=404#comment-481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the 2007 implications, I do not think we are going to see a complete return to the pre-Dunbar offense.  I believe Tedford did make a few comments saying that he intends to keep some aspects of what Dunbar implemented.  And with what was seen during the spring practices and spring game, it appears as if we will continue to see plenty of shotgun and spread.  Nevertheless, I am optimistic about future critical playcalling situations since Tedford will be calling the shots.  

I&#039;m glad you know that the game was closer than the score indicated.  So many casual fans think the game was a murder but only 2-3 missed tackles made the game.  Of course, Tennessee fans will claim that&#039;s our homerism speaking, but in all honesty our claim is fairly truthful.  If we had made those tackles, Tennessee might not have scored or at least scored less.  That would give more time and opportunities for our offense to score.  If we did score, the game would have been entirely different.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the 2007 implications, I do not think we are going to see a complete return to the pre-Dunbar offense.  I believe Tedford did make a few comments saying that he intends to keep some aspects of what Dunbar implemented.  And with what was seen during the spring practices and spring game, it appears as if we will continue to see plenty of shotgun and spread.  Nevertheless, I am optimistic about future critical playcalling situations since Tedford will be calling the shots.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you know that the game was closer than the score indicated.  So many casual fans think the game was a murder but only 2-3 missed tackles made the game.  Of course, Tennessee fans will claim that&#8217;s our homerism speaking, but in all honesty our claim is fairly truthful.  If we had made those tackles, Tennessee might not have scored or at least scored less.  That would give more time and opportunities for our offense to score.  If we did score, the game would have been entirely different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Crawford</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=404#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=404#comment-480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rishi, an important point to remember is that we had #2 on your list last year.  True, a more polished team with a better game plan will make it easier to take advantage of #2, but it doesn&#039;t change that we had it and couldn&#039;t take advantage of it.

Personally, I think your #1 and #3 as well as the following will be the big positive differences:

-new #2. not having the Tedford-Dunbar experiment still needing the kinks worked out (or said another way, using the traditional Tedford offense)
-#4. Experience at corner.

Whether those will be enough to beat Tennessee with the other weaknesses that will be exposed and the changes in Tennessee&#039;s strengths and weaknesses... personally I think is very hard to call at this point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rishi, an important point to remember is that we had #2 on your list last year.  True, a more polished team with a better game plan will make it easier to take advantage of #2, but it doesn&#8217;t change that we had it and couldn&#8217;t take advantage of it.</p>
<p>Personally, I think your #1 and #3 as well as the following will be the big positive differences:</p>
<p>-new #2. not having the Tedford-Dunbar experiment still needing the kinks worked out (or said another way, using the traditional Tedford offense)<br />
-#4. Experience at corner.</p>
<p>Whether those will be enough to beat Tennessee with the other weaknesses that will be exposed and the changes in Tennessee&#8217;s strengths and weaknesses&#8230; personally I think is very hard to call at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=404#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rishi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=404#comment-479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m still going blind, but I like your analysis.

There are three factors that I think will give Cal the edge here:
1) Homefield Advantage - Memorial Stadium isn&#039;t Neyland, but it&#039;ll still be an advantage, especially if Gameday is there.
2) Desean Jackson&#039;s playmaking abilities. He can outrun CBs, he can return punts for touchdowns. If Tennessee doesn&#039;t cover him adequately, he makes big plays. If Tennessee pushes too many defenders on him as a WR, that leaves Hawkins, Jordan, or Stevens open for a big play. If Tennessee tries to avoid punting to him, they screw up (think A&amp;M in the Holiday Bowl).
3) Revenge as a motivating factor - Not just pride for Cal, but pride for the entire Pac-10 and, in turn, west coast football, is at stake. Tennessee came into the 2006 game off an incredibly disappointing 2005 season where it came in ranked in the top five (number three in some polls) and ended it losing to Vanderbilt for the first time in twenty-something years. 

I actually want it to be a blow-out this year, but I know better than to expect that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still going blind, but I like your analysis.</p>
<p>There are three factors that I think will give Cal the edge here:<br />
1) Homefield Advantage &#8211; Memorial Stadium isn&#8217;t Neyland, but it&#8217;ll still be an advantage, especially if Gameday is there.<br />
2) Desean Jackson&#8217;s playmaking abilities. He can outrun CBs, he can return punts for touchdowns. If Tennessee doesn&#8217;t cover him adequately, he makes big plays. If Tennessee pushes too many defenders on him as a WR, that leaves Hawkins, Jordan, or Stevens open for a big play. If Tennessee tries to avoid punting to him, they screw up (think A&amp;M in the Holiday Bowl).<br />
3) Revenge as a motivating factor &#8211; Not just pride for Cal, but pride for the entire Pac-10 and, in turn, west coast football, is at stake. Tennessee came into the 2006 game off an incredibly disappointing 2005 season where it came in ranked in the top five (number three in some polls) and ended it losing to Vanderbilt for the first time in twenty-something years. </p>
<p>I actually want it to be a blow-out this year, but I know better than to expect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=404#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=404#comment-478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really, really good work Ken!  Glad to have you back for real this time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, really good work Ken!  Glad to have you back for real this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
