Comments on: A brave new world? https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=43 My personal/Catholic blog Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:31:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38 By: kencraw https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=43#comment-55 Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:28:11 +0000 http://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=43#comment-55 Brian, you’re absolutely right that a family need not include both a mom and a dad. That’s not my point, although I’ll admit I didn’t explain myself as well as I should have.

At first I was going to respond to this as a a comment, but there is enough to say here to justify a whole post, so expect that shortly…

]]> By: Ken's Brother https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=43#comment-54 Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:01:11 +0000 http://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=43#comment-54 Ken,
I’m always amazed at how willing you are to forget your upbringing. You were brought up better than making statements like
“Additionally you’ll get the “I’m a mom” homosexuals who intend to further manipulate the concept of a family to cater to their political agenda. The article even mentions research to create an embryo without a man being involved. Gee, I wonder who wants that? The artificial womb opens up the idea of a baby without a woman involved too. Ugh.”
I know you know a gay couple who adopted a son and loved that son, and treated that son to a better life than a LOT of straight couples. So get over yourself on this concept that a family *has* to include a Dad and a Mom.

And don’t respond with Dad’s famous line that you don’t make rules for exceptions either…

]]>