<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catholic sex education for a teenage baseball fan</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=81" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81</link>
	<description>My personal/Catholic blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken's Brother</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken's Brother]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sigh, there is way to much thought into these guys.
But to beat a dead horse (and quote the great Tom Hanks)
There is no crying in baseball lol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sigh, there is way to much thought into these guys.<br />
But to beat a dead horse (and quote the great Tom Hanks)<br />
There is no crying in baseball lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Crawford</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See, I thought about rule #2 being over specific but wasn&#039;t sure whether it would be as clear without the &quot;by yourself&quot; qualifier.  I thought of something like:

#2. No practice is allowed except for warming up for the game.  Warming up and not playing is not allowed.

Back to rule #5, maybe there should be an addition:

5. You canâ€™t play the game if the umpires wonâ€™t let you score.  However, it is acceptable to play in weather where a shutout is naturally likely.

Another possible addition to a rule:

4. There are no trades or free agency; you must be on the same team your whole life.  By extension, there are no professional players.  These are volunteer teams. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I thought about rule #2 being over specific but wasn&#8217;t sure whether it would be as clear without the &#8220;by yourself&#8221; qualifier.  I thought of something like:</p>
<p>#2. No practice is allowed except for warming up for the game.  Warming up and not playing is not allowed.</p>
<p>Back to rule #5, maybe there should be an addition:</p>
<p>5. You canâ€™t play the game if the umpires wonâ€™t let you score.  However, it is acceptable to play in weather where a shutout is naturally likely.</p>
<p>Another possible addition to a rule:</p>
<p>4. There are no trades or free agency; you must be on the same team your whole life.  By extension, there are no professional players.  These are volunteer teams. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did have to think about Rule #5 for a little bit, but I did figure it out. I had to think about the &quot;Catholic method&quot; and then it all made sense.

As a corollary to Rule #2 (and perhaps it is covered by Rule #1, &quot;You can&#039;t practice with anyone else.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did have to think about Rule #5 for a little bit, but I did figure it out. I had to think about the &#8220;Catholic method&#8221; and then it all made sense.</p>
<p>As a corollary to Rule #2 (and perhaps it is covered by Rule #1, &#8220;You can&#8217;t practice with anyone else.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Crawford</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, if anyone can think of any other rules or different/better ways to say the existing rules, I&#039;d be interested to hear them.

Also, even though it is implicitely covered by rules #1 and #5, one might want to explicitely state what becomes rule #6:

#6.  Your team can only have two players and they must consist of one lefty and one righty.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, if anyone can think of any other rules or different/better ways to say the existing rules, I&#8217;d be interested to hear them.</p>
<p>Also, even though it is implicitely covered by rules #1 and #5, one might want to explicitely state what becomes rule #6:</p>
<p>#6.  Your team can only have two players and they must consist of one lefty and one righty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Crawford</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huh?  Neither, although in re-thinking about it I could see why one might think that but only for God.  Remember that the woman and man makeup the team so that&#039;s out of the equation.

But it&#039;s not God either.  You&#039;re thinking of &quot;score&quot; in the wrong context.  That&#039;s &quot;playing the game&quot;.  &quot;Scoring&quot; would be the &quot;outcome&quot; of playing the game.  Who can change &quot;outcome&quot; of playing?  The umpire.

Making sense now?

Maybe I should have said that you can&#039;t play if there is a net stopping the ball from leaving the park.  Or you can&#039;t play if the bat is corked (there&#039;s a mixed metaphor if there ever was one, so scratch that one.).  Or maybe you can&#039;t play if the pitcher is prevented from getting the ball across the plate.

You catching the drift yet?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh?  Neither, although in re-thinking about it I could see why one might think that but only for God.  Remember that the woman and man makeup the team so that&#8217;s out of the equation.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not God either.  You&#8217;re thinking of &#8220;score&#8221; in the wrong context.  That&#8217;s &#8220;playing the game&#8221;.  &#8220;Scoring&#8221; would be the &#8220;outcome&#8221; of playing the game.  Who can change &#8220;outcome&#8221; of playing?  The umpire.</p>
<p>Making sense now?</p>
<p>Maybe I should have said that you can&#8217;t play if there is a net stopping the ball from leaving the park.  Or you can&#8217;t play if the bat is corked (there&#8217;s a mixed metaphor if there ever was one, so scratch that one.).  Or maybe you can&#8217;t play if the pitcher is prevented from getting the ball across the plate.</p>
<p>You catching the drift yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>https://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecrawfordfamily.net/blog/?p=81#comment-106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who are the umpires: women or God? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are the umpires: women or God? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
