FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!
Jesus Christ! Save us! Have mercy on us ALL!
This article is the lead article right now on the San Francisco Chronicle’s homepage. It highlights an organization called Voluntary Human Extinction Movement. The title of their organization properly sums up the goal of the organzation: The extinction of the human race.
I don’t think I’ve read an article that made my blood boil more than this one in a LONG time. Even Mark Morford’s overly sexualized screeds don’t provoke me as much as this one did.
Included in the article full of blantent lies are the following blood boiling statements:
1. That the UN thinks that we’re having a population explosion. Actually, the UN thinks that the world population is going to peak in 2050 or so and is then headed for a disasterous decline. The article even quotes the UN Study that says this, but only points out the peak population (projected) in 2050 as 9.1 billion. Talk about dishonest! There is no mention in the article that the 9.1 figure is a peak and that we’re headed towards decline. It’s quoted in the “the world just keeps growing, 9.1 billion by 2050!” style.
2. The aticle directly contradicts itself regarding the goals of this organization. To quote, “It’s obvious that the intentional creation of another [human being] by anyone anywhere can’t be justified today.” (emphasis mine) says the founder of the organization who later is paraphrased as saying “In many ways, the idea of reducing the world’s population is as much about human quality of life as it is about the health of the planet.” HELLO!?! Do you have a stinking brain cell working in you! You’re arguing for the EXTINCTION of humanity. You are NOT arguing for population reduction. Hell, as referenced in the article, you’re slogan is “May we live long and die out”.
3. Also stated in the article “Knight takes care to point out that VHEMT isn’t anti-child.” YES YOU ARE! That’s EXACTLY what you are saying: “reproducing would bump you up into the Hummer-driver category.” as you say in the article. And we all know that you’re the type of person who thinks that anyone who drives a Hummer is pure evil.
As a cover for their “we don’t hate kids” crap, they talk about the benefits of adoption or to use his words: “In light of the number of species going extinct because of our increase, and the tens of thousands of children dying every day from preventable causes, there’s just no good reason to have a child,” adds Knight. “We have to ignore all those children to create another one. It’s like saying, ‘Well, they just don’t matter.’ But they do matter: They’re all children in the human family.”
See, this is a PERFECT example of a person seeing a GLIMMER of truth and explioting to an extreme that does a disservice to all of humanity. What do I think of when I think of people who choose not to have children and instead spend their whole lives helping others, mostly children? Why but of course I think of nuns. What else would I think of, being Catholic? Many orders of religious were setup for the sole purpose of helping the less fortunate. These are people who are willing to forgo a ‘normal’ life to live a life of service helping others.
But what do those who do not know God do when faced with the same realization?
They call for the extinction of the human race while telling us that they’re not anti-child.
That’s IT! Expect a fisk about this post in the next day or two…
November 16th, 2005 at 8:36 pm
On kind of a side note, I am happy to see that the pop will not coninue to grow exponentially into the future. It wouldn’t be a very fun world if we had to share it with 100 billion other people. I remember in college we read a lot of books in Demography that predicted doom and gloom due to populations in the future.
While I can’t say I’m all gung-ho about having children (80% of Californians can’t afford to buy a house, and I am one of them, so I don’t think the cost of raising a child is one I want to shoulder any time soon) I do agree that these guys are crazy nutjobs. I guess my stand is one of steady-state. That is, each parental unit should have a number of children that keeps the population stable (let’s say two, but the actual number is something like 2.1345 etc..). That way, we don’t go extinct, but we also do not overpopulate the earth and have to go to war for resources.
November 17th, 2005 at 2:36 pm
Ya know, when I first saw this article I thought to myself … “how many blood vessels will still be present on Ken’s forhead at the Big Game after he reads this article”
LOL right now the Vegas under is 5…