Pharmatists right to choose
Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006I was reading an article about pharmacists and dispensing birth-control or abortifacients. The arguments continue to amaze me. It’s best summed up by one line in the article:
“The discussion often comes down to one of rights: the right of pharmacists not to do something that violates their consciences versus the right of patients to obtain legally prescribed medications.”
Since when is “obtaining legally prescribed medications” a right? I’m pretty darned sure that if a person shows up at a pharmacy without money their “right” to that medication will be refused. In other words, there is no right to medical treatment in this country.
It seems to me that yet again the issue is that the debate is being held in the wrong arena. If I go to an Indian resturant and they “refuse” to serve me a steak, is my “right” to eat beef being violated? No, it isn’t. If I want a steak, I need to go somewhere else. However, it is well within my rights to refuse to eat there and/or put pressure on the company/resturant to sell steaks.
I believe the same scenario applies to the medical industry as a whole.
I’ve got no problem (from a legal/governmental perspective) with Planned Parenthood protesting Target for allowing their pharamists to exercise their freedom of conscience by not dispensing plan-B. I’ve also got no problem with Walmart firing a pharacist who exercises their freedom of conscience just as I’ve got no problem with Cattlemans Steak House firing an Indian chef who refuses to cook a steak.
But I DO have a problem with the government forcing people to do things they do not want to do, including pharmacists who would otherwise be able to keep their jobs.
So, to recap: If you want a steak, don’t go to an Indian resturant. If you want fried dog for dinner, you may have to drive a while to find a place that will serve it to you. If you want your pharmacist to give you what he considers to be immoral prescriptions, go find a new pharmacist. If there aren’t any pharmacists who will fill your prescription in the area, do what any fried dog lover would do: move/go somewhere where you can.
Update (after comment #8): My brother has posted on the subject. The key quote that shows his lack of consistency: “I believe that no one should ever force their morals onto someone else, and that includes me forcing my morals onto Pharmacists, but honestly, if they don’t like the rules of being a pharmacist, they can get anotherÂ
So, no forcing morals on Pharmacists… except they should do what you say or get a new career?